PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRGX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRGX achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's 1,644,791.35% return.


FFRGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.82%
YTD
13.54%
6M
13.00%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

FRAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1,599,541.56%
YTD
1,644,791.35%
6M
1,644,517.81%
1Y
1,729,686.80%
3Y*
2,590.99%
5Y*
609.45%
10Y*
173.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRGX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D
13.54%23.41%15.21%20.31%-18.37%16.96%17.58%28.53%-9.77%20.48%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
1,644,791.35%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%10.28%-2.05%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRGX and FRAMX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.69

The correlation between FFRGX and FRAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRGX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRGX
FFRGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFRGXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-548,102.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

76,384.47

-76,383.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

523,435.99

-523,432.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

2,185,767.38

-2,185,753.95

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRGX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRGX drawdown since its inception was -32.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRGX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRGXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-33.94%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-3.45%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

-5.02%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-16.31%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-3.82%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.82%

+1.50%

Volatility

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX) is 5.71%, while Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a volatility of 967.33%. This indicates that FFRGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRGXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

967.33%

-961.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

967.35%

-955.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

1,592,536.58%

-1,592,522.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

712,487.94%

-712,471.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

503,504.00%

-503,486.64%

Dividends

FFRGX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

FFRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRGX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
102.97%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRGX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.33%) compared to FFRGX (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRGX dropped -32.87% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

FFRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRGX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer