FFRGX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FFRGX (Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FFRGX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFRGX returned 10.14%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRGX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return.

FFRGX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 14.66%
• 1Y: 28.63%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: —

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFRGX Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D	12.35%	23.41%	15.21%	20.31%	-18.37%	16.96%	17.58%	28.53%	-9.77%	20.48%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRGX and FCNTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.83

The correlation between FFRGX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFRGX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRGX

FFRGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FFRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FFRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FFRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FFRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFRGX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.72	+0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	2.39	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.31	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	2.13	+2.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.09	9.04	+10.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRGX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFRGX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	1.72	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.79	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.78	-0.04

Drawdowns

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRGX drawdown since its inception was -32.87%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRGX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFRGX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.87%	-49.19%	+16.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-11.30%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.45%	-19.75%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.15%	-32.59%	+4.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.53%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-8.16%	+2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.65%	-0.37%

Volatility

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FFRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFRGX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.26%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	10.48%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	14.03%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	19.15%	-2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.33%	19.68%	-2.35%

Dividends

FFRGX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FFRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FFRGX Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFRGX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FFRGX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFRGX or FCNTX?

FFRGX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRGX dropped -32.87% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.