PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRAX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRAX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRAX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.57%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


FFRAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.43%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.57%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRAX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
1.82%5.28%6.83%11.35%-1.77%4.83%1.38%8.19%-0.09%3.52%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRAX and VOO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRAX
FFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFRAXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.43

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

3.16

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.31

14.73

+2.58

FFRAX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRAX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFRAXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.39

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.75

0.83

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.87

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.89

+0.29

Drawdowns

FFRAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRAX drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRAX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRAXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-33.99%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.21%

-8.90%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-18.69%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.02%

-24.52%

+18.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.21%

-33.99%

+11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.70%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-3.69%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.91%

-1.57%

Volatility

FFRAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) is 0.59%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FFRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRAXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

2.84%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

8.90%

-7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

11.80%

-9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

16.81%

-13.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

18.01%

-13.88%

FFRAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRAX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
6.78%7.12%6.69%7.24%3.57%2.47%3.56%4.86%4.42%3.77%4.14%3.42%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FFRAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRAX dropped -22.21% vs VOO's -33.99%.

FFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRAX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer