FFRAX vs. EIFAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFRAX (Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A) and EIFAX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund) are both mutual funds - FFRAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while EIFAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, FFRAX returned 4.60%/yr vs 5.09%/yr for EIFAX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFRAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EIFAX.

Performance

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRAX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRAX has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 4.60%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.09% annualized return.

FFRAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

EIFAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: 6.86%
• 5Y*: 4.87%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFRAX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A	1.48%	5.28%	6.83%	11.35%	-1.77%	4.83%	1.38%	8.19%	-0.09%	3.52%
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	0.37%	4.54%	8.91%	11.86%	-2.98%	5.41%	1.90%	9.02%	0.28%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRAX and EIFAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008	0.67

The correlation between FFRAX and EIFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFRAX vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRAX

FFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

EIFAX

EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 37
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFRAX	EIFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.35	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.24	2.86	+2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.40	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	1.53	+3.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.86	4.61	+11.25

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRAX and EIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRAX drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRAX and EIFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFRAX	EIFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.21%	-40.28%	+18.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.21%	-2.29%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.31%	-3.43%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.02%	-7.63%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.21%	-24.22%	+2.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.32%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-2.26%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.76%	-0.41%

Volatility

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) is 0.62%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that FFRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFRAX	EIFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	0.70%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	1.98%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39%	2.59%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.88%	3.15%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.13%	4.46%	-0.33%

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFRAX vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

FFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, less than EIFAX's 7.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	7.64%	8.09%	8.91%	7.02%	5.92%	4.03%	4.51%	5.58%	5.10%	4.46%	5.02%	5.29%
FFRAX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A	6.80%	7.12%	6.69%	7.24%	3.57%	2.47%	3.56%	4.86%	4.42%	3.77%	4.14%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFRAX and EIFAX in my portfolio?

FFRAX and EIFAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFRAX or EIFAX?

EIFAX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to FFRAX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRAX dropped -22.21% vs EIFAX's -40.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.