FFOX vs. USO
FFOX (FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FFOX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. FFOX is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. FFOX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
FFOX vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return.
FFOX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 97.72%
- 6M
- 91.54%
- 1Y
- 97.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
FFOX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 4.58% | 9.95% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 97.72% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOX and USO is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFOX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
FFOX
USO
FFOX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | -0.18 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
FFOX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOX and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -98.19% | +85.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -85.45% | +82.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -75.30% | +73.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.84% | — |
Volatility
FFOX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFOX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 44.32% | -27.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 36.09% | -18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 39.00% | -21.69% |
FFOX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFOX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
FFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 1.73% | 1.81% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFOX and USO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for FFOX.
FFOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
FFOX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FundX and USCF. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for FFOX and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for FFOX and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer