FFOX vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FFOX (FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. FFOX is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. FFOX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

FFOX vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FFOX

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.02%
• 6M: 5.10%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 1Y: 17.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.29%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF	$395.01K	$437.64K	$512.79K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FFOX vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF	6.66%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

FFOX vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFOX	QQQN
Industrials	25.6%	8.7%
Technology	22.0%	47.3%
Healthcare	20.8%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	13.7%
Financial Services	7.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	1.4%
Basic Materials	3.6%	1.9%
Communication Services	2.1%	5.5%
Energy	1.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

FFOX vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFOX

FFOX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFOX vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFOX	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	—	—

Drawdowns

FFOX vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOX and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFOX	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.41%	0.00%	-12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	0.00%	-2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	0.00%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFOX	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.00%	0.00%	+18.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.36%	0.00%	+17.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.36%	0.00%	+17.36%

FFOX vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFOX vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

FFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF	1.67%	1.81%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FFOX or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFOX or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for FFOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFOX or QQQN?

FFOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between FFOX and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: FundX and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for FFOX and 0.18% for QQQN.