FFOX vs. COMB
FFOX (FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFOX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. FFOX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
FFOX vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.81% return.
FFOX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FFOX vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 3.19% | 9.95% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOX and COMB is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFOX vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
FFOX
COMB
FFOX vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOX | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.52 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
FFOX vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOX and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOX | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -33.50% | +21.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -4.35% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -12.06% | +9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility
FFOX vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFOX | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 17.02% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 16.70% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 15.13% | +2.17% |
FFOX vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFOX vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
FFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than COMB's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFOX and COMB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for FFOX.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 1.76% for FFOX.
FFOX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FundX and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for FFOX and 0.25% for COMB.
Find the right allocation for FFOX and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer