PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOG vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOG vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOG achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.


FFOG

1D
-2.84%
1M
-3.11%
6M
4.56%
YTD
4.40%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOG vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FFOG
Franklin Focused Growth ETF
4.40%17.09%38.20%12.25%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOG and QARP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

0.65

The correlation between FFOG and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFOG vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFOG
QARP

Technology

57.4%
23.5%

Communication Services

13.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
9.6%

Healthcare

6.3%
13.9%

Industrials

5.7%
8.5%

Financial Services

2.6%
12.1%

Utilities

1.6%
2.0%

Energy

0.7%
5.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.6%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

FFOG
57.4%
QARP
23.5%

Communication Services

FFOG
13.0%
QARP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FFOG
12.0%
QARP
9.6%

Healthcare

FFOG
6.3%
QARP
13.9%

Industrials

FFOG
5.7%
QARP
8.5%

Financial Services

FFOG
2.6%
QARP
12.1%

Utilities

FFOG
1.6%
QARP
2.0%

Energy

FFOG
0.7%
QARP
5.8%

Basic Materials

FFOG

-

QARP
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

FFOG

-

QARP
9.6%

Real Estate

FFOG

-

QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOG vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOG
FFOG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FFOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOG vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFOGQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.43

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

3.46

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

15.38

-13.91

FFOG vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOG and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFOG vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOG drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOG and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOGQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.38%

-35.44%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.90%

-7.26%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.58%

0.00%

-6.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-4.39%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

1.63%

+5.92%

Volatility

FFOG vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that FFOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOGQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

2.76%

+6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.67%

8.22%

+10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.60%

10.58%

+12.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.31%

15.54%

+8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.31%

19.55%

+4.76%

FFOG vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFOG vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

FFOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FFOG
Franklin Focused Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFOG and QARP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFOG has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOG dropped -25.38% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 1-year performance, QARP leads with 25.00% vs 11.07% for FFOG. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QARP has performed better with a 25.00% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFOG.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FFOG.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFOG and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOG and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer