FFLV vs. FBCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).

FFLV and FBCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFLV is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 22, 2024. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

FFLV vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FFLV vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	2.59%	16.04%	8.04%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	25.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's -8.61% return.

FFLV

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: 8.74%
• 1Y: 16.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLV vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

FBCG

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

FFLV

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF

Return for Risk

FFLV vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLV

FFLV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLV vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFLV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.97	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.54	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	1.65	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	5.92	+0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFLV vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLV and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFLV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	0.97	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.67	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FFLV and FBCG is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FFLV vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	1.59%	1.60%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

FFLV vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLV	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-43.56%	+26.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-15.17%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.27%	-11.09%	+5.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-11.79%	+8.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	4.23%	-1.56%

Volatility

FFLV vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is 4.27%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that FFLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLV	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	8.22%	-3.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	14.74%	-6.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	26.28%	-10.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.44%	25.82%	-11.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.44%	25.92%	-11.48%