PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLV vs. CDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFLV vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFLV vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 8.56% return.


FFLV

1D
0.28%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
2.88%
6M
8.74%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CDC

1D
-0.43%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.44%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
9.47%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLV vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFLV vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLV
FFLV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLV vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLVCDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

0.93

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.33

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.07

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.41

4.26

+2.14

FFLV vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLV and CDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLVCDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.93

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.74

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between FFLV and CDC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFLV vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than CDC's 3.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
1.58%1.60%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.21%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%

Drawdowns

FFLV vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum CDC drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and CDC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLVCDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-21.37%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-11.27%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.00%

-3.49%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-5.14%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.82%

-0.13%

Volatility

FFLV vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) at 2.81%. This indicates that FFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFLVCDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

2.81%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

7.04%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

13.59%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

12.56%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

13.22%

+1.20%