FFLS vs. HTUS
FFLS (Future Fund Long/Short ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Future Fund, while HTUS is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFLS returned 10.27%/yr vs 21.06%/yr for HTUS. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFLS charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
FFLS vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLS achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 12.44% return.
FFLS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- -2.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.14%
HTUS
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $154.32K | $128.25K | $158.86K | |
| $513.88K | $512.72K | $620.13K |
FFLS vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 0.09% | 7.49% | 17.71% | 0.79% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 12.44% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLS and HTUS is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FFLS and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLS vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
FFLS
HTUS
FFLS vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFLS | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.38 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 2.82 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 13.42 | -13.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFLS vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLS drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLS and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLS | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -47.50% | +36.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -8.68% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.05% | -24.41% | +13.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | 0.00% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -4.02% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 1.82% | +3.86% |
Volatility
FFLS vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 3.34%. This indicates that FFLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLS | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.34% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 10.33% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 12.28% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 19.11% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 21.52% | -10.02% |
FFLS vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLS has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLS vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, less than HTUS's 10.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 6.57% | 6.58% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.58% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFLS and HTUS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFLS has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to HTUS (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLS dropped -11.05% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 3-year performance, HTUS leads with 21.06% vs 10.27% for FFLS. On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 21.06% return vs 10.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTUS is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.58%, compared with 6.57% for FFLS.
FFLS is categorized as Long-Short, while HTUS is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Future Fund and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for FFLS and 0.96% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFLS and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer