FFLS vs. CLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX).
FFLS and CLIX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFLS is an actively managed fund by The Future Fund. It was launched on Jun 20, 2023. CLIX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2017.
Performance
FFLS vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFLS vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | -5.65% | 7.49% | 17.71% | 2.03% |
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -11.46% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 10.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLS achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly higher than CLIX's -11.46% return.
FFLS
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -8.08%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.75%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFLS vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLS has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFLS vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank
FFLS
CLIX
FFLS vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFLS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.00 | 0.72 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 1.10 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.77 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 2.25 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFLS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 0.72 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.15 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLS and CLIX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFLS vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison
FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than CLIX's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 6.97% | 6.58% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.60% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
FFLS vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLS drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLS and CLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -73.21% | +62.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -19.57% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -68.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | -47.70% | +37.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -34.53% | +31.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 6.70% | -2.52% |
Volatility
FFLS vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) is 3.06%, while ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that FFLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFLS | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 7.78% | -4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 16.32% | -10.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.24% | 22.94% | -13.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 27.03% | -15.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 26.04% | -14.85% |