PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLC vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -3.11% return.


FFLC

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
8.51%
6M
9.11%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
15.52%
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
8.51%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%18.76%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%20.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and BRK-B is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FFLC and BRK-B has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLC vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLCBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.00

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.14

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

-0.30

+11.02

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLCBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

-0.09

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.65

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.48

+0.67

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLCBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-53.86%

+34.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-9.42%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-14.95%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-26.58%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-9.78%

+7.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-11.07%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.49%

-2.28%

Volatility

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLCBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.98%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

10.87%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

14.38%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.13%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

19.44%

-1.77%

Dividends

FFLC vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
1.01%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFLC and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRK-B has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to FFLC (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLC dropped -19.72% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

FFLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLC and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer