PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFIDX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFIDX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIDX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFIDX having a 15.36% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 15.56%.


FFIDX

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.03%
YTD
3.65%
6M
4.46%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
15.36%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIDX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
3.65%20.04%27.13%30.93%-25.88%33.22%26.43%33.46%-5.31%23.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIDX and VOO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.95

The correlation between FFIDX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFIDX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIDX
FFIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FFIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIDX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFIDXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.16

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

14.73

-5.45

FFIDX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIDX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFIDXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.39

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.83

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.87

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.89

-0.41

Drawdowns

FFIDX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIDX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIDX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFIDXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-33.99%

-21.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-8.90%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.42%

-18.69%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.33%

-24.52%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.66%

-33.99%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.70%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-3.69%

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.91%

+0.66%

Volatility

FFIDX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFIDXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.84%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

8.90%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

11.80%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

16.81%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

18.01%

+1.41%

FFIDX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFIDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFIDX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FFIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
1.13%1.18%0.00%2.41%0.67%4.60%2.71%5.41%7.40%11.12%7.01%5.48%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FFIDX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FFIDX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIDX dropped -55.35% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFIDX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer