PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. HDMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFGX vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFGX vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than HDMV's 4.79% return.


FFGX

1D
3.99%
1M
-8.67%
YTD
0.24%
6M
2.81%
1Y
20.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDMV

1D
0.58%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
4.79%
6M
8.22%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFGX vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGXHDMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.55

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

2.02

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.43

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

8.61

-2.66

FFGX vs. HDMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the HDMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and HDMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGXHDMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.55

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.42

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and HDMV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FFGX vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than HDMV's 4.68% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.60%1.62%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.68%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum HDMV drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and HDMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXHDMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-32.01%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-8.73%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.38%

-5.54%

-3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-6.83%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.46%

+0.82%

Volatility

FFGX vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) at 5.40%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFGXHDMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.96%

5.40%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

8.26%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

13.16%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

11.94%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

13.23%

+5.09%