PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGX vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly higher than FELC's 11.23% return.


FFGX

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.58%
YTD
14.06%
6M
16.61%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FELC

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
14.06%27.85%-2.87%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
11.23%17.09%-0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FELC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.75

The correlation between FFGX and FELC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGXFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.16

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

14.66

-6.87

FFGX vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGXFELCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.41

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.59

-0.23

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum FELC drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-18.59%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-9.09%

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.59%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-1.91%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

1.95%

+1.30%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) at 2.78%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGXFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

2.78%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

8.93%

+6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

11.90%

+5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.06%

15.17%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

15.17%

+3.89%

FFGX vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGX vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than FELC's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.85%0.92%1.03%0.04%
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.40%1.62%0.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGX and FELC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FELC (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.79% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs 25.28% for FFGX. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 25.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFGX.

FFGX has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.85% for FELC.

FFGX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FELC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFGX and 0.18% for FELC.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGX and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer