FFGTX vs. CCSZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFGTX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M) and CCSZX (Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, FFGTX returned 11.95%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for CCSZX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFGTX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CCSZX.

Performance

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly lower than CCSZX's 21.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGTX has outperformed CCSZX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while CCSZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.77% annualized return.

FFGTX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 35.84%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

CCSZX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -6.97%
• YTD: 21.56%
• 6M: 20.34%
• 1Y: 29.38%
• 3Y*: 13.66%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 6.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M	15.68%	27.96%	2.37%	-5.62%	20.06%	25.38%	5.41%	17.23%	-13.73%	17.38%
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	21.56%	15.36%	7.11%	-6.90%	15.80%	31.34%	-1.17%	7.45%	-14.09%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGTX and CCSZX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012	0.56

The correlation between FFGTX and CCSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGTX vs. CCSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGTX

FFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CCSZX

CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 43
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGTX	CCSZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.64	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.16	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.29	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	2.86	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.49	9.86	+4.63

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the CCSZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGTX and CCSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CCSZX drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and CCSZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGTX	CCSZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.53%	-61.34%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-9.56%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-11.17%	-8.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.31%	-27.86%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.88%	-34.16%	-14.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	-9.56%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.32%	-31.26%	+10.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.89%	-0.45%

Volatility

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) at 3.75%. This indicates that FFGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGTX	CCSZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	3.75%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.87%	14.49%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	16.65%	+0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.40%	16.88%	+4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.45%	14.91%	+7.54%

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSZX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGTX vs. CCSZX - Dividend Comparison

FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than CCSZX's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	2.47%	3.00%	8.84%	4.42%	94.73%	36.39%	0.13%	1.09%	18.52%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M	1.74%	2.02%	1.93%	1.47%	1.47%	2.91%	1.03%	2.51%	1.57%	0.36%	1.05%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGTX and CCSZX in my portfolio?

FFGTX and CCSZX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGTX or CCSZX?

FFGTX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to CCSZX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGTX dropped -58.53% vs CCSZX's -61.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.