FFGTX vs. BICSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX).
FFGTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. BICSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2011.
Performance
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 22.70% | 27.96% | 2.37% | -5.62% | 20.06% | 25.38% | 5.41% | 17.23% | -13.73% | 17.38% |
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio | 19.23% | 28.70% | 4.38% | -4.32% | 11.90% | 22.44% | 6.80% | 11.60% | -14.50% | 8.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly higher than BICSX's 19.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGTX has outperformed BICSX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while BICSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.38% annualized return.
FFGTX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 22.70%
- 6M
- 30.84%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
BICSX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 19.23%
- 6M
- 26.56%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BICSX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGTX vs. BICSX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGTX
BICSX
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGTX | BICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.54 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 3.22 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.87 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 19.67 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGTX | BICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.90 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.69 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.28 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGTX and BICSX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Dividend Comparison
FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than BICSX's 2.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 1.64% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.47% | 1.47% | 2.91% | 1.03% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 0.36% | 1.05% | 2.07% |
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio | 2.59% | 3.09% | 3.60% | 9.39% | 9.05% | 2.68% | 0.80% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than BICSX's maximum drawdown of -51.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and BICSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGTX | BICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -51.59% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -10.53% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -22.35% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.88% | -35.82% | -13.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -1.36% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -20.75% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.07% | +0.78% |
Volatility
FFGTX vs. BICSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) at 4.48%. This indicates that FFGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BICSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGTX | BICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 4.48% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 12.47% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 16.34% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 15.83% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 15.12% | +7.42% |