FFGCX vs. FSAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX).
FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 1.81% | 143.05% | 14.97% | -0.37% | -13.46% | -10.44% | 26.83% | 35.50% | -13.00% | 8.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's 1.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFGCX having a 13.82% annualized return and FSAGX not far ahead at 14.04%.
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
FSAGX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.44%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAGX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGCX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGCX
FSAGX
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGCX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.02 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 2.29 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.84 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.89 | 10.66 | +7.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGCX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.02 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.62 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.43 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.22 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and FSAGX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than FSAGX's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and FSAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGCX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -77.21% | +19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -29.85% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.22% | -45.94% | +18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | -50.57% | +2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -25.44% | +23.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -33.41% | +13.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 7.95% | -5.12% |
Volatility
FFGCX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) is 6.10%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that FFGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGCX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 15.39% | -9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 35.05% | -21.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 42.73% | -22.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 32.76% | -11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 33.05% | -10.51% |