FFGCX vs. DBCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX).
FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. DBCMX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on May 17, 2015.
Performance
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 23.68% | 6.10% | 0.45% | -3.96% | 13.40% | 31.24% | -6.07% | 4.78% | -10.65% | 9.17% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFGCX having a 22.87% return and DBCMX slightly higher at 23.68%. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX has outperformed DBCMX with an annualized return of 13.82%, while DBCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.37% annualized return.
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
DBCMX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 13.32%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGCX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGCX
DBCMX
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGCX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.29 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 3.02 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.42 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.64 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.89 | 13.71 | +4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGCX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.29 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.69 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.51 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.51 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and DBCMX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than DBCMX's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 46.88% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 5.23% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than DBCMX's maximum drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and DBCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGCX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -37.62% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -7.93% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.22% | -27.60% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | -37.62% | -10.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | 0.00% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -13.47% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.10% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FFGCX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) have volatilities of 6.10% and 6.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGCX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.16% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 9.94% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 12.77% | +7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 16.16% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 14.50% | +8.04% |