FFGAX vs. DBCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX).
FFGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. DBCMX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on May 17, 2015.
Performance
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A | 22.77% | 28.27% | 2.63% | -5.35% | 20.37% | 25.70% | 5.78% | 17.54% | -13.44% | 17.38% |
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 23.68% | 6.10% | 0.45% | -3.96% | 13.40% | 31.24% | -6.07% | 4.78% | -10.65% | 9.17% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFGAX having a 22.77% return and DBCMX slightly higher at 23.68%. Over the past 10 years, FFGAX has outperformed DBCMX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while DBCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.37% annualized return.
FFGAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 31.02%
- 1Y
- 51.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
DBCMX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 13.32%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGAX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGAX
DBCMX
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGAX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 2.29 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 3.02 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.64 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 13.71 | +3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGAX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.29 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.69 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.51 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.51 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGAX and DBCMX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison
FFGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than DBCMX's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A | 1.83% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.79% | 1.68% | 3.16% | 1.30% | 2.84% | 1.93% | 0.36% | 1.29% | 2.51% |
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 46.88% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 5.23% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGAX drawdown since its inception was -57.71%, which is greater than DBCMX's maximum drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGAX and DBCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGAX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.71% | -37.62% | -20.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -7.93% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.29% | -27.60% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.61% | -37.62% | -10.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | 0.00% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -13.47% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.10% | +0.74% |
Volatility
FFGAX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGAX | DBCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 6.16% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 9.94% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 12.77% | +7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 16.16% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 14.50% | +8.06% |