FFGAX vs. BICSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FFGAX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A) and BICSX (BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, FFGAX returned 11.83%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for BICSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFGAX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for BICSX.

Performance

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGAX achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than BICSX's 12.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGAX has outperformed BICSX with an annualized return of 11.83%, while BICSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.

FFGAX

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 35.03%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 13.42%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

BICSX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 14.22%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: 8.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A	15.43%	28.27%	2.63%	-5.35%	20.37%	25.70%	5.78%	17.54%	-13.44%	17.38%
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio	12.85%	28.70%	4.38%	-4.32%	11.90%	22.44%	6.80%	11.60%	-14.50%	8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGAX and BICSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011	0.88

The correlation between FFGAX and BICSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGAX vs. BICSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGAX

FFGAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FFGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FFGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FFGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FFGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BICSX

BICSX Risk / Return Rank: 52
BICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGAX	BICSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.81	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.37	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	3.06	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.49	12.49	+2.01

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the BICSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGAX and BICSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGAX drawdown since its inception was -57.71%, which is greater than BICSX's maximum drawdown of -51.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGAX and BICSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGAX	BICSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.71%	-51.59%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-8.82%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-10.53%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.29%	-22.35%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.61%	-35.82%	-12.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.75%	-8.82%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.78%	-20.47%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	2.18%	+0.19%

Volatility

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) at 3.96%. This indicates that FFGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BICSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGAX	BICSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	3.96%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	12.25%	+1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	14.96%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.41%	15.80%	+5.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	15.04%	+7.42%

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BICSX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGAX vs. BICSX - Dividend Comparison

FFGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than BICSX's 2.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio	2.74%	3.09%	3.60%	9.39%	9.05%	2.68%	0.80%	2.03%	2.12%	0.65%	0.94%	0.00%
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A	1.94%	2.24%	2.32%	1.79%	1.68%	3.16%	1.30%	2.84%	1.93%	0.36%	1.29%	2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGAX and BICSX in my portfolio?

FFGAX and BICSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGAX or BICSX?

FFGAX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to BICSX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGAX dropped -57.71% vs BICSX's -51.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.