FFFZX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFFZX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FFFZX returned 12.16%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for LTSTX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFFZX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A (FFFZX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFZX achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFZX has outperformed LTSTX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while LTSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.

FFFZX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 12.68%
• 6M: 12.20%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

LTSTX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: 11.92%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 8.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFFZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A	12.68%	22.79%	13.31%	18.99%	-18.35%	15.72%	17.26%	26.34%	-8.49%	20.21%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	4.65%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-6.41%	16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFZX and LTSTX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008	0.96

The correlation between FFFZX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFFZX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFZX

FFFZX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FFFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FFFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FFFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FFFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FFFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 49
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A (FFFZX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFFZX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.83	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.63	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.35	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	2.46	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.60	10.92	+1.68

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFZX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFZX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than LTSTX's maximum drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFZX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFFZX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.70%	-48.17%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-5.24%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.14%	-8.12%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.52%	-21.01%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.28%	-23.33%	-7.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.52%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-6.14%	-2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.18%	+1.06%

Volatility

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A (FFFZX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.74%. This indicates that FFFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFFZX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.47%	2.74%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	5.87%	+5.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.44%	7.05%	+6.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	9.23%	+5.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.55%	9.84%	+5.71%

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFZX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFFZX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FFFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than LTSTX's 11.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A	7.01%	6.25%	1.44%	1.34%	10.74%	9.51%	5.21%	6.78%	11.61%	3.53%	4.64%	3.73%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.65%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFFZX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FFFZX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFFZX or LTSTX?

FFFZX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to LTSTX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFZX dropped -56.70% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.