PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFQX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M (FFFQX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FFFQX

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.19%
6M
7.58%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
20.69%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
11.17%

FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M
10.62%22.44%13.11%18.59%-18.53%15.46%16.93%8.36%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFQX and FRQHX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.80

The correlation between FFFQX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFQX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFQX
FFFQX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FFFQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M (FFFQX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFQXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFQXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

Volatility

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFQXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFQX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FFFQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M
6.61%5.79%1.25%1.08%10.39%9.23%5.07%6.49%11.27%4.06%4.30%3.45%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.25%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFQX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFQX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer