PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFQX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M (FFFQX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFFQX having a 10.75% return and FZROX slightly lower at 10.58%.


FFFQX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.68%
6M
6.56%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
21.61%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
11.15%
ALL TIME*
7.40%

FZROX

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.29%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FFFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M
10.75%22.44%13.11%18.59%-18.53%15.46%16.93%26.02%-9.96%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
10.58%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFQX and FZROX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FFFQX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFQX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFFQX
FFFQX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FFFQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M (FFFQX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFQXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.24

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

9.70

-1.15

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFQX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFQX drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFQX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFQXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

-34.96%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-8.89%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.19%

-19.38%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.62%

-25.12%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.28%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-5.43%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.06%

+0.32%

Volatility

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M (FFFQX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 3.48%. This indicates that FFFQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFQXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.48%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

10.35%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

13.20%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

17.54%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

20.03%

-4.51%

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFQX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FFFQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than FZROX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class M
6.61%5.79%1.25%1.08%10.39%9.23%5.07%6.49%11.27%4.06%4.30%3.45%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FFFQX and FZROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFQX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FZROX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFQX dropped -58.33% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFQX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer