PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFLX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFFLX having a 12.29% return and DRILX slightly higher at 12.39%. Over the past 10 years, FFFLX has underperformed DRILX with an annualized return of 11.80%, while DRILX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.


FFFLX

1D
0.55%
1M
4.70%
YTD
12.29%
6M
13.94%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
11.80%

DRILX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.03%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A
12.29%22.73%13.41%18.92%-18.34%15.79%17.25%26.29%-8.46%21.36%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.39%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFLX and DRILX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between FFFLX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFLX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFLX
FFFLX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FFFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFLXDRILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.52

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.70

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

16.18

-3.55

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFLX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFLXDRILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.87

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.81

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.82

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.82

-0.37

Drawdowns

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFLX drawdown since its inception was -58.29%, which is greater than DRILX's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFLX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFLXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.29%

-33.48%

-24.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-8.58%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-15.76%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-23.50%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.22%

-33.48%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-4.24%

-4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.88%

+0.36%

Volatility

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) at 3.12%. This indicates that FFFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFLXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.12%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

8.72%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

11.07%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

14.84%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

15.75%

-0.27%

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFLX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFLX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

FFFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than DRILX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%0.00%
FFFLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A
6.57%5.87%1.42%1.25%10.58%9.34%5.18%6.72%11.39%4.24%4.52%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFLX and DRILX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFFLX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to DRILX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFLX dropped -58.29% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFLX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer