FFFLX vs. JLGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX).
FFFLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 1, 2006. JLGMX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A | -1.04% | 22.73% | 13.41% | 18.92% | -18.34% | 15.79% | 17.25% | 26.29% | -8.46% | 21.36% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -8.48% | 14.38% | 35.40% | 34.95% | -25.20% | 18.48% | 56.39% | 39.47% | 0.74% | 38.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFFLX achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's -8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFLX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.
FFFLX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
JLGMX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -10.35%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFFLX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFFLX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank
FFFLX
JLGMX
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFFLX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.64 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.05 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 0.81 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 2.47 | +5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFFLX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.64 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.85 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFFLX and JLGMX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison
FFFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than JLGMX's 12.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A | 5.93% | 5.87% | 1.42% | 1.25% | 10.58% | 9.34% | 5.18% | 6.72% | 11.39% | 4.24% | 4.52% | 3.69% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 12.06% | 11.04% | 2.12% | 0.31% | 3.49% | 14.25% | 5.14% | 12.65% | 15.59% | 14.44% | 9.71% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFFLX drawdown since its inception was -58.29%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFLX and JLGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFFLX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.29% | -31.82% | -26.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -16.73% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -31.13% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.22% | -31.82% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -13.83% | +6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -5.82% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 5.51% | -2.95% |
Volatility
FFFLX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) have volatilities of 6.57% and 6.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFFLX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 6.48% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 12.54% | -2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 21.14% | -5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 20.25% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 21.54% | -6.13% |