FFFHX vs. DGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT).
FFFHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 1, 2006. DGT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the The Global Dow. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000.
Performance
FFFHX vs. DGT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFFHX vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund | -0.49% | 23.72% | 14.11% | 20.45% | -18.29% | 16.59% | 18.25% | 25.33% | -8.90% | 22.29% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.98% | 30.04% | 14.15% | 20.95% | -8.00% | 21.50% | 9.67% | 22.19% | -9.65% | 24.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFFHX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFHX has underperformed DGT with an annualized return of 11.22%, while DGT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.29% annualized return.
FFFHX
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
DGT
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFFHX vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFFHX vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank
FFFHX
DGT
FFFHX vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFFHX | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 2.22 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.09 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 10.12 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFFHX | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.88 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFFHX and DGT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFFHX vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison
FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than DGT's 2.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund | 4.16% | 4.14% | 1.86% | 1.78% | 11.83% | 11.76% | 4.93% | 6.48% | 7.69% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.16% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
FFFHX vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, roughly equal to the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and DGT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFFHX | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -55.36% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -12.45% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.39% | -25.18% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | -34.40% | +3.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.93% | -5.00% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -13.92% | +5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.58% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FFFHX vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) at 5.57%. This indicates that FFFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFFHX | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 5.57% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 9.11% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 16.42% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 15.10% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 16.94% | -1.63% |