FFFGX vs. FASMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFFGX (Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund) and FASMX (Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund) are both mutual funds - FFFGX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FASMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FFFGX returned 12.38%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for FASMX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFFGX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FASMX.

Performance

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFGX achieves a 13.46% return, which is significantly higher than FASMX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFGX has outperformed FASMX with an annualized return of 12.38%, while FASMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.

FFFGX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 13.46%
• 6M: 15.30%
• 1Y: 30.80%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

FASMX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFFGX Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund	13.46%	23.77%	13.95%	20.56%	-18.29%	16.55%	18.22%	25.41%	-8.89%	22.22%
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	9.03%	14.94%	8.46%	13.09%	-14.93%	9.86%	14.72%	18.25%	-5.51%	11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFGX and FASMX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2006	0.97

The correlation between FFFGX and FASMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFFGX vs. FASMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFGX

FFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FASMX

FASMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFFGX	FASMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.65	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.78	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.51	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.38	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.49	14.80	-0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FASMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFGX and FASMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFFGX	FASMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.65	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.70	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.84	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.85	-0.36

Drawdowns

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFGX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, which is greater than FASMX's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFGX and FASMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFFGX	FASMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.61%	-37.75%	-16.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-6.19%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-9.28%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.33%	-20.54%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.95%	-21.27%	-9.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-4.12%	-4.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.41%	+0.75%

Volatility

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) at 2.67%. This indicates that FFFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFFGX	FASMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	2.67%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	6.50%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	7.91%	+4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	9.32%	+5.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.36%	9.31%	+6.05%

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FASMX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFFGX vs. FASMX - Dividend Comparison

FFFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than FASMX's 6.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	6.93%	7.58%	3.88%	2.18%	6.78%	2.91%	2.40%	4.21%	5.11%	2.24%	1.69%	5.77%
FFFGX Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund	5.79%	4.40%	1.97%	1.84%	12.04%	12.00%	4.99%	6.51%	7.82%	4.01%	4.15%	4.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFFGX and FASMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FFFGX and FASMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFFGX or FASMX?

FFFGX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FASMX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFGX dropped -54.61% vs FASMX's -37.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.