PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFCX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFCX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFCX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


FFFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.84%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.48%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFCX and FFGZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FFFCX and FFGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFCX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFCXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.54

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.18

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

14.23

-0.28

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFCX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFCXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.64

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.65

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.97

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.93

-0.25

Drawdowns

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFCX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFCX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFCXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.88%

-14.94%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-3.33%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-4.76%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.35%

-14.94%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

-14.94%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-2.26%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.74%

+0.18%

Volatility

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FFFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFCXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.49%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

3.34%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95%

4.01%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

5.08%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

4.43%

+1.87%

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFCX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFCX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

FFFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FFFCX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFCX dropped -36.88% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFCX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer