PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFCX vs. FFFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund (FFFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFCX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than FFFEX's 8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFCX has underperformed FFFEX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while FFFEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.


FFFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.84%

FFFEX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.34%
YTD
8.94%
6M
9.98%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.48%
FFFEX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund
8.94%17.68%9.22%15.37%-16.97%11.53%15.64%21.82%-7.02%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFCX and FFFEX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1996

0.97

The correlation between FFFCX and FFFEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFCX vs. FFFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFEX
FFFEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund (FFFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFCXFFFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.48

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.12

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

13.59

+0.36

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FFFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFCX and FFFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFCXFFFEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.47

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.62

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.83

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.52

+0.17

Drawdowns

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFCX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, smaller than the maximum FFFEX drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFCX and FFFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFCXFFFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.88%

-51.83%

+14.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-6.90%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-9.97%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.35%

-24.32%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

-24.64%

+6.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-9.02%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.58%

-0.66%

Volatility

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) is 2.02%, while Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund (FFFEX) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that FFFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFCXFFFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.15%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

7.25%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95%

8.72%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

10.76%

-4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

11.41%

-5.11%

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFCX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFEX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFCX vs. FFFEX - Dividend Comparison

FFFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than FFFEX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
FFFEX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund
6.04%5.44%2.94%1.87%10.06%10.92%6.24%6.79%7.32%4.60%3.86%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FFFCX and FFFEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFEX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to FFFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFCX dropped -36.88% vs FFFEX's -51.83%.

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFCX and FFFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer