FFF vs. ILCG
FFF (Founders 100 ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FFF is actively managed, while ILCG is passively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
FFF vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 7.63% return.
FFF
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 17.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $61.65K | $77.62K | $91.68K | |
| $5.46M | $7.04M | $9.78M |
FFF vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | -3.41% | -1.66% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 7.63% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFF and ILCG is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFF vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
FFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILCG
FFF vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFF | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFF vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFF | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.89% | -52.98% | +31.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -6.94% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -8.20% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.91% | — |
Volatility
FFF vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFF | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.58% | 18.72% | +7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 22.37% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 21.70% | +4.88% |
FFF vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFF vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFF and ILCG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.
ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.
They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.04% for ILCG.
Find the right allocation for FFF and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer