FFEM vs. HEEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM).
FFEM and HEEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFEM is managed by Fidelity. HEEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014.
Performance
FFEM vs. HEEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFEM vs. HEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 6.04% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 6.21% | 34.02% | -0.11% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFEM having a 6.04% return and HEEM slightly higher at 6.21%.
FFEM
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEEM
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFEM vs. HEEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HEEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. HEEM — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
HEEM
FFEM vs. HEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.12 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.78 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.22 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | 12.72 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.12 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.40 | +1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and HEEM is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFEM vs. HEEM - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than HEEM's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.54% | 1.59% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.74% | 3.98% | 2.38% | 2.75% | 7.49% | 1.93% | 1.49% | 3.04% | 2.37% | 2.05% | 1.84% | 6.28% |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. HEEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum HEEM drawdown of -33.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and HEEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -33.53% | +17.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -11.42% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -7.64% | -2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -11.28% | +8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.89% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. HEEM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) at 8.92%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | HEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 8.92% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 13.25% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 17.52% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 16.55% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 17.75% | +3.38% |