PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEM vs. EMDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFEM vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFEM vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 11.89% return.


FFEM

1D
4.43%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
6.04%
6M
12.60%
1Y
41.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMDM

1D
5.02%
1M
-11.39%
YTD
11.89%
6M
27.11%
1Y
68.49%
3Y*
24.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFEM vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFEM vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEM
FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEM vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEMEMDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

2.93

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.54

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.54

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.31

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.69

18.18

-6.49

FFEM vs. EMDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the EMDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEM and EMDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEMEMDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.93

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.27

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between FFEM and EMDM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFEM vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison

FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than EMDM's 3.19% yield.


TTM202520242023
FFEM
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF
1.54%1.59%0.16%0.00%
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
3.19%3.57%5.87%2.16%

Drawdowns

FFEM vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum EMDM drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and EMDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEMEMDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-18.81%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-15.65%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-11.42%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-4.16%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.71%

-0.18%

Volatility

FFEM vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) is 11.96%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that FFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFEMEMDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.96%

13.46%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

18.35%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

23.54%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

18.98%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

18.98%

+2.15%