FFEM vs. EMDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM).
FFEM and EMDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFEM is managed by Fidelity. EMDM is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 2, 2023.
Performance
FFEM vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFEM vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 6.04% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 11.89% | 59.68% | -4.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 11.89% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMDM
- 1D
- 5.02%
- 1M
- -11.39%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 68.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFEM vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
EMDM
FFEM vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.93 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.54 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.54 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.31 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | 18.18 | -6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.93 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 1.27 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and EMDM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFEM vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than EMDM's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.54% | 1.59% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 3.19% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum EMDM drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and EMDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -18.81% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -15.65% | +2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -11.42% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -4.16% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.71% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) is 11.96%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that FFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 13.46% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 18.35% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 23.54% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 18.98% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 18.98% | +2.15% |