FFEM vs. DGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFEM (Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF) and DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, FFEM returned 68.49% vs 27.26% for DGS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DGS.

Performance

FFEM vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 33.06% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 14.53% return.

FFEM

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 9.73%
• YTD: 33.06%
• 6M: 36.71%
• 1Y: 68.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DGS

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 27.26%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEM vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF	33.06%	40.03%	-2.27%
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund	14.53%	21.18%	-1.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FFEM and DGS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024	0.85

The correlation between FFEM and DGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFEM vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEM

FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 89
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

DGS

DGS Risk / Return Rank: 51
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEM vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFEM	DGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	1.76	+1.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	2.43	+1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.32	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	2.72	+2.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.18	9.16	+11.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFEM vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEM and DGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFEM	DGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	1.76	+1.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.21	0.23	+1.98

Drawdowns

FFEM vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and DGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFEM	DGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.29%	-61.83%	+45.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.57%	-10.06%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-1.40%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-12.59%	+10.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.98%	+0.43%

Volatility

FFEM vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 5.24%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFEM	DGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	5.24%	+3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	13.03%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.56%	15.56%	+6.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	14.87%	+7.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.02%	17.32%	+4.70%

FFEM vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFEM vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than DGS's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund	3.21%	3.45%	3.36%	4.55%	5.34%	3.98%	3.69%	3.95%	4.24%	2.81%	3.42%	3.28%
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF	1.22%	1.59%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFEM and DGS in my portfolio?

FFEM and DGS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFEM or DGS?

FFEM has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEM dropped -16.29% vs DGS's -61.83%.

Which ETF is better, FFEM or DGS?

On 1-year performance, FFEM leads with 68.49% vs 27.26% for DGS. On fees, DGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFEM or DGS?

Over the 1-year period, FFEM has performed better with a 68.49% return vs 27.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFEM or DGS?

DGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FFEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFEM or DGS?

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 1.22% for FFEM.

What is the main difference between FFEM and DGS?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FFEM and 0.58% for DGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.