FFEB vs. UGA
FFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. FFEB is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFEB returned 10.96%/yr vs 24.07%/yr for UGA. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.
Performance
FFEB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEB achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 72.77% return.
FFEB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.84%
UGA
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 54.03%
- YTD
- 72.77%
- 1Y
- 71.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 24.07%
- 10Y*
- 16.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $845.17K | $725.47K | $1.75M | |
| $8.67M | $6.11M | $4.99M |
FFEB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February | 9.86% | 13.76% | 16.64% | 19.95% | -7.51% | 16.26% | 9.36% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 72.77% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -20.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEB and UGA is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2020 | 0.14 |
The correlation between FFEB and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFEB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
FFEB
UGA
FFEB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFEB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.32 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 3.54 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.64 | 9.75 | +5.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFEB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEB drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEB and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.14% | -86.59% | +63.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | -20.32% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.89% | -26.68% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.85% | -38.11% | +24.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.67% | +14.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -36.52% | +34.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 7.36% | -6.25% |
Volatility
FFEB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) is 1.97%, while United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that FFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFEB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 13.00% | -11.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 32.16% | -26.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.28% | 36.60% | -29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.83% | 34.71% | -23.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 37.31% | -23.70% |
FFEB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFEB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
Neither FFEB nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FFEB and UGA have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to FFEB (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEB dropped -23.14% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 24.07% vs 10.96% for FFEB. On fees, FFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.
FFEB and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FFEB and 1.02% for UGA.
FFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFEB and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer