FFDI vs. FDT
FFDI (Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, FFDI returned 12.65% vs 55.05% for FDT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFDI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
FFDI vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFDI achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return.
FFDI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
FFDI vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFDI Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF | 6.62% | 26.66% | -2.09% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 25.50% | 52.21% | -1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFDI and FDT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FFDI and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFDI vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
FFDI
FDT
FFDI vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.54 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 4.13 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 16.12 | -12.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 3.00 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.40 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
FFDI vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFDI drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFDI and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -46.10% | +31.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -13.41% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -1.59% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -10.78% | +8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.43% | -0.29% |
Volatility
FFDI vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) is 6.15%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that FFDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFDI | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 7.23% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 15.91% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 18.42% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 18.23% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 18.52% | +0.15% |
FFDI vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFDI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFDI vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
FFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.84% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
FFDI Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF | 2.07% | 2.16% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFDI and FDT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to FFDI (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFDI dropped -14.39% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 1-year performance, FDT leads with 55.05% vs 12.65% for FFDI. On fees, FFDI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FFDI has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDT has performed better with a 55.05% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFDI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.07% for FFDI.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFDI and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFDI and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer