PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFANX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFANX achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FFANX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


FFANX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.05%
6M
4.98%
YTD
7.14%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
6.58%
ALL TIME*
5.51%

TSAIX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.36%
6M
7.58%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.14%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
10.73%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FFANX and TSAIX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011

0.92

The correlation between FFANX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFANX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFANXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.22

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

9.31

+1.89

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFANX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFANX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFANX drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFANX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFANXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.69%

-34.58%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-10.28%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

-17.29%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-28.28%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.52%

-34.58%

+16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-4.88%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.44%

-1.19%

Volatility

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) is 2.18%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that FFANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFANXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

4.43%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.29%

11.84%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36%

14.29%

-6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.99%

16.44%

-8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.74%

17.62%

-9.88%

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFANX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFANX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

FFANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than TSAIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.64%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.67%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FFANX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSAIX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FFANX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFANX dropped -31.69% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFANX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer