FFANX vs. SWYDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) and SWYDX (Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FFANX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock, while SWYDX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 5 years, FFANX returned 5.34%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for SWYDX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFANX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWYDX.

Performance

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFANX achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than SWYDX's 5.67% return.

FFANX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 7.09%
• 6M: 7.62%
• 1Y: 16.64%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

SWYDX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	7.09%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%
SWYDX Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund	5.67%	12.60%	8.62%	14.47%	-14.78%	10.24%	12.37%	18.89%	-6.38%	14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FFANX and SWYDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016	0.95

The correlation between FFANX and SWYDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFANX	SWYDX
Technology	26.1%	27.6%
Financial Services	16.5%	14.3%
Industrials	13.2%	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.8%
Healthcare	8.9%	8.0%
Communication Services	7.8%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	4.7%
Basic Materials	4.5%	3.2%
Energy	3.8%	3.9%
Utilities	2.6%	2.4%
Real Estate	2.3%	8.2%

Return for Risk

FFANX vs. SWYDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SWYDX

SWYDX Risk / Return Rank: 67
SWYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SWYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SWYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SWYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SWYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFANX	SWYDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.39	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.50	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.46	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	2.98	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.45	13.43	+1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFANX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the SWYDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFANX and SWYDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFANX	SWYDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.39	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.61	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.75	-0.08

Drawdowns

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFANX drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, which is greater than SWYDX's maximum drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFANX and SWYDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFANX	SWYDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-20.49%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.20%	-4.94%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.55%	-7.56%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-20.43%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.37%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-3.43%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	1.09%	+0.10%

Volatility

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX) at 2.10%. This indicates that FFANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFANX	SWYDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	2.10%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.46%	4.94%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.61%	6.16%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.86%	9.20%	-1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.70%	9.82%	-2.12%

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFANX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYDX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFANX vs. SWYDX - Dividend Comparison

FFANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than SWYDX's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.66%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%
SWYDX Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund	5.08%	5.37%	3.41%	2.58%	2.32%	1.92%	1.79%	1.91%	0.00%	1.33%	0.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFANX and SWYDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FFANX and SWYDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFANX or SWYDX?

FFANX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to SWYDX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFANX dropped -31.69% vs SWYDX's -20.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.