PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. RFEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. RFEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than RFEU's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed RFEU with an annualized return of 11.23%, while RFEU has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
0.10%
1M
1.13%
6M
6.29%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
25.36%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
7.84%

RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
7.31%
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.83M$51.15M$96.31M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FEZ vs. RFEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
10.27%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and RFEU is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FEZ and RFEU has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FEZ vs. RFEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
RFEU

Financial Services

26.2%
18.9%

Industrials

22.1%
15.4%

Technology

16.6%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
9.3%

Healthcare

5.3%
13.3%

Utilities

4.9%
6.4%

Energy

4.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.2%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

FEZ
26.2%
RFEU
18.9%

Industrials

FEZ
22.1%
RFEU
15.4%

Technology

FEZ
16.6%
RFEU
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
9.5%
RFEU
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.6%
RFEU
9.3%

Healthcare

FEZ
5.3%
RFEU
13.3%

Utilities

FEZ
4.9%
RFEU
6.4%

Energy

FEZ
4.5%
RFEU
8.7%

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.5%
RFEU
1.2%

Communication Services

FEZ
1.9%
RFEU
3.8%

Real Estate

FEZ

-

RFEU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. RFEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEZ vs. RFEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZRFEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.65

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.43

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

16.81

-10.70

FEZ vs. RFEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the RFEU Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and RFEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. RFEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than RFEU's maximum drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and RFEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZRFEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-39.74%

-24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-4.83%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-13.48%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-35.92%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-39.74%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-9.47%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

1.30%

+2.60%

Volatility

FEZ vs. RFEU - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) at 0.00%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZRFEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

0.00%

+5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

1.44%

+14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

7.08%

+11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

16.67%

+4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

17.42%

+3.28%

FEZ vs. RFEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RFEU's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. RFEU - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than RFEU's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.55%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.37%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and RFEU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs RFEU's -39.74%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.23% vs 7.31% for RFEU. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.37% for RFEU.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and RFEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer