FEZ vs. NVO
FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) is Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 10.66%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for NVO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEZ vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 10.66%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.20% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
NVO
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- -10.96%
- YTD
- -16.56%
- 6M
- -9.23%
- 1Y
- -42.47%
- 3Y*
- -17.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
FEZ vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 4.68% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -16.56% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and NVO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2002 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
NVO
FEZ vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEZ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.86 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.77 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | -1.14 | +4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEZ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | -0.82 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.05 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.19 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.47 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -74.70% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -55.03% | +41.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -74.70% | +58.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -74.70% | +39.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -74.70% | +35.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -70.19% | +67.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.07% | -17.77% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 37.21% | -33.21% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 5.64%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 9.75% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 38.30% | -23.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 52.08% | -33.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 38.31% | -17.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 32.56% | -11.44% |
Dividends
FEZ vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than NVO's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.39% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and NVO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to FEZ (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs NVO's -74.70%.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer