PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 11.53%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.84%
YTD
6.43%
6M
6.45%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
11.53%

FSZ

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.06%
YTD
2.53%
6M
1.73%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.43%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and FSZ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.72

The correlation between FEZ and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEZ vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
FSZ

Financial Services

23.8%
22.0%

Technology

19.6%
4.9%

Industrials

19.3%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.6%
14.6%

Energy

5.3%

-

Utilities

5.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

3.8%
9.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Financial Services

FEZ
23.8%
FSZ
22.0%

Technology

FEZ
19.6%
FSZ
4.9%

Industrials

FEZ
19.3%
FSZ
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
9.3%
FSZ
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.9%
FSZ
4.9%

Healthcare

FEZ
5.6%
FSZ
14.6%

Energy

FEZ
5.3%
FSZ

-

Utilities

FEZ
5.0%
FSZ
2.4%

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.8%
FSZ
9.8%

Communication Services

FEZ
2.6%
FSZ
2.4%

Real Estate

FEZ

-

FSZ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.07

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

2.61

+2.21

FEZ vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-33.97%

-30.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-10.39%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-13.93%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-33.96%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-33.97%

-5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-4.66%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-6.98%

-10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

4.24%

-0.25%

Volatility

FEZ vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) at 4.07%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

4.07%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.57%

11.05%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.40%

14.34%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

19.35%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

18.75%

+2.00%

FEZ vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than FSZ's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.64%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.38%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and FSZ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to FSZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 10.25% for FSZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.38% for FSZ.

FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.80% for FSZ.

FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer