FEZ vs. FLEH
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FEZ tracks the EURO STOXX 50 Index while FLEH tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEZ returned 11.73%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for FLEH. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEH.
Performance
FEZ vs. FLEH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEZ having a 12.58% return and FLEH slightly lower at 12.16%.
FEZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 26.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
FLEH
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.34M | $49.98M | $91.56M | |
| $191.22K | $190.22K | $237.23K |
FEZ vs. FLEH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 12.58% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | -1.98% |
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 12.16% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and FLEH is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FEZ and FLEH shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FEZ vs. FLEH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
FLEH
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FEZ
FLEH
Industrials
FEZ
FLEH
Technology
FEZ
FLEH
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
FLEH
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
FLEH
Healthcare
FEZ
FLEH
Utilities
FEZ
FLEH
Energy
FEZ
FLEH
Basic Materials
FEZ
FLEH
Communication Services
FEZ
FLEH
Real Estate
FEZ
-
FLEH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. FLEH — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
FLEH
FEZ vs. FLEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | FLEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.84 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 6.71 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. FLEH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than FLEH's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and FLEH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | FLEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -33.94% | -30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -13.41% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -15.67% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -18.67% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -4.64% | -12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 3.67% | +0.23% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. FLEH - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) at 4.38%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | FLEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 4.38% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.99% | 15.47% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 17.69% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 16.54% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 18.24% | +2.46% |
FEZ vs. FLEH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. FLEH - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FLEH's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 2.62% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FEZ and FLEH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEZ has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FLEH (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs FLEH's -33.94%.
On 5-year performance, FLEH leads with 12.21% vs 11.73% for FEZ. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEH has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLEH has performed better with a 12.21% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FLEH has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.50% for FEZ.
FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.09% for FLEH.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and FLEH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer