FEZ vs. EWP
FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FEZ tracks the EURO STOXX 50 Index while EWP tracks the MSCI Spain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for EWP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWP.
Performance
FEZ vs. EWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 10.28%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
EWP
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 30.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
FEZ vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 5.18% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 5.49% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and EWP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2002 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FEZ and EWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
EWP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FEZ
EWP
Industrials
FEZ
EWP
Technology
FEZ
EWP
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
EWP
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
EWP
-
Healthcare
FEZ
EWP
Energy
FEZ
EWP
Utilities
FEZ
EWP
Communication Services
FEZ
EWP
Basic Materials
FEZ
EWP
-
Real Estate
FEZ
-
EWP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
EWP
FEZ vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEZ | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.87 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 2.51 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.07 | -1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 10.91 | -6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEZ | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.87 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.85 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.31 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and EWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -61.19% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -11.38% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -12.19% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -33.91% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -46.36% | +6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.60% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.07% | -21.43% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 3.19% | +0.80% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) at 6.12%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 6.12% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 15.64% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 18.76% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 20.24% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 22.23% | -1.12% |
FEZ vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than EWP's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.15% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.57% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and EWP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEZ has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to EWP (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs EWP's -61.19%.
On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 10.99% vs 10.28% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.15% for EWP.
FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.50% for EWP.
EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and EWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer