FEX vs. GXLC
FEX (First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FEX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
FEX vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEX achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 8.31% return.
FEX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
GXLC
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEX vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEX First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 16.10% | 2.27% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.31% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEX and GXLC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEX vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
FEX
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FEX vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEX | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEX vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEX drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEX | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.81% | -9.08% | -49.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -3.05% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -1.54% | -6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | — | — |
Volatility
FEX vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEX | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 13.85% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 13.85% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 13.85% | +4.75% |
FEX vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEX vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
FEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEX First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 0.80% | 1.21% | 1.32% | 1.34% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.33% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEX and GXLC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FEX.
FEX has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.
FEX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FEX and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for FEX and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer