FEUZ vs. FLSW
FEUZ (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF) and FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FEUZ tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index while FLSW tracks the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEUZ returned 9.94%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for FLSW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEUZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLSW.
Performance
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 1.77% return.
FEUZ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
FLSW
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUZ First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF | 11.32% | 56.34% | 1.64% | 17.24% | -19.83% | 11.93% | 5.04% | 22.06% | -19.36% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 1.77% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEUZ and FLSW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FEUZ and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEUZ
FLSW
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
FEUZ
FLSW
Energy
FEUZ
FLSW
-
Financial Services
FEUZ
FLSW
Consumer Cyclical
FEUZ
FLSW
Utilities
FEUZ
FLSW
Basic Materials
FEUZ
FLSW
Technology
FEUZ
FLSW
Real Estate
FEUZ
FLSW
Consumer Defensive
FEUZ
FLSW
Healthcare
FEUZ
FLSW
Communication Services
FEUZ
FLSW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUZ vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank
FEUZ
FLSW
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEUZ | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.00 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 3.24 | +6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEUZ | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.86 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and FLSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUZ | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -28.16% | -19.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -13.38% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -13.38% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.64% | -28.16% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -6.34% | +5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -5.96% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 4.11% | -0.82% |
Volatility
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 5.13%. This indicates that FEUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUZ | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 5.13% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 12.16% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 15.55% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 15.71% | +6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 16.89% | +4.89% |
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSW's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUZ vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison
FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than FLSW's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUZ First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF | 2.37% | 2.81% | 2.01% | 2.95% | 3.14% | 2.52% | 1.46% | 1.93% | 2.46% | 1.29% | 2.12% | 1.09% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEUZ and FLSW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEUZ has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FLSW (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUZ dropped -48.08% vs FLSW's -28.16%.
On 5-year performance, FEUZ leads with 9.94% vs 6.80% for FLSW. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FEUZ has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.
FEUZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 2.08% for FLSW.
FEUZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEUZ and 0.09% for FLSW.
FEUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEUZ and FLSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer