PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUZ vs. EWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUZ vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 18.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 10.35%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.


FEUZ

1D
-0.85%
1M
3.37%
YTD
11.32%
6M
15.72%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.35%

EWN

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.09%
6M
18.14%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUZ vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
11.32%56.34%1.64%17.24%-19.83%11.93%5.04%22.06%-20.61%36.70%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.09%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUZ and EWN is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2014

0.72

The correlation between FEUZ and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEUZ vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEUZ
EWN

Industrials

27.4%
10.2%

Energy

10.8%
2.1%

Financial Services

10.6%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
1.5%

Utilities

8.3%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%
3.1%

Technology

6.1%
34.8%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
11.5%

Healthcare

5.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.7%
14.7%

Industrials

FEUZ
27.4%
EWN
10.2%

Energy

FEUZ
10.8%
EWN
2.1%

Financial Services

FEUZ
10.6%
EWN
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FEUZ
9.2%
EWN
1.5%

Utilities

FEUZ
8.3%
EWN

-

Basic Materials

FEUZ
7.5%
EWN
3.1%

Technology

FEUZ
6.1%
EWN
34.8%

Real Estate

FEUZ
6.0%
EWN
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEUZ
5.3%
EWN
11.5%

Healthcare

FEUZ
5.2%
EWN
2.6%

Communication Services

FEUZ
3.7%
EWN
14.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUZ vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUZ
FEUZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FEUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUZ vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUZEWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.57

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

9.70

-0.28

FEUZ vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUZ and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUZEWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.73

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.38

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.31

+0.13

Drawdowns

FEUZ vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and EWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUZEWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-65.22%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-13.24%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-19.77%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-43.57%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.08%

-43.57%

-4.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.30%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-16.35%

+5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

3.49%

-0.20%

Volatility

FEUZ vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) is 6.59%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that FEUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUZEWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

7.50%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

16.37%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.31%

19.68%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

22.88%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

21.36%

+0.42%

FEUZ vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUZ vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than EWN's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.26%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
2.37%2.81%2.01%2.95%3.14%2.52%1.46%1.93%2.46%1.29%2.12%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUZ and EWN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to FEUZ (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUZ dropped -48.08% vs EWN's -65.22%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 12.79% vs 10.35% for FEUZ. On fees, EWN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FEUZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 2.37% for FEUZ.

FEUZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEUZ and 0.50% for EWN.

FEUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUZ and EWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer