PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUS vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUS achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.


FEUS

1D
-0.77%
1M
5.74%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.59%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10Y*

SPTM

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEUS
FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund
10.28%14.67%23.10%25.54%-19.10%9.97%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.10%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUS and SPTM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.98

The correlation between FEUS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEUS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEUS
SPTM

Technology

35.2%
34.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

11.1%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.6%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.8%

Energy

3.7%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.3%

Utilities

1.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.0%

Technology

FEUS
35.2%
SPTM
34.0%

Financial Services

FEUS
11.9%
SPTM
12.1%

Communication Services

FEUS
11.1%
SPTM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FEUS
10.6%
SPTM
10.3%

Healthcare

FEUS
8.6%
SPTM
8.6%

Industrials

FEUS
8.6%
SPTM
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

FEUS
4.6%
SPTM
4.8%

Energy

FEUS
3.7%
SPTM
3.7%

Real Estate

FEUS
2.2%
SPTM
2.3%

Utilities

FEUS
1.9%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

FEUS
1.6%
SPTM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUS
FEUS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUSSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.22

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

15.01

-3.26

FEUS vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUS and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUSSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.36

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.46

+0.28

Drawdowns

FEUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUS drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUS and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUSSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-54.80%

+29.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-8.68%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-18.87%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.67%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-9.05%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.86%

+0.38%

Volatility

FEUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 2.88%. This indicates that FEUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUSSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

2.88%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

8.92%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

11.88%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

16.87%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

18.03%

-1.02%

FEUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

FEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUS
FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund
0.98%1.06%1.15%1.41%1.48%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FEUS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEUS has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUS dropped -25.31% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 21.90% vs 20.38% for FEUS. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 20.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FEUS.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.98% for FEUS.

FEUS tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FEUS and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUS and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer