FEUS vs. GXLC
FEUS (FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FEUS tracks the Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FEUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
FEUS vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 8.31% return.
FEUS
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEUS vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEUS FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund | 7.39% | 3.59% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.31% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEUS and GXLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUS vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
FEUS
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FEUS vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEUS | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEUS vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUS drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUS and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUS | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -9.08% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -3.05% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -1.54% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
FEUS vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUS | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 13.85% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 13.85% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 13.85% | +3.18% |
FEUS vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEUS vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
FEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUS FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 0.36% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FEUS and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FEUS.
FEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.
FEUS tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FEUS and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for FEUS and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer