PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUS vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUS vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 8.31% return.


FEUS

1D
-1.00%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
7.39%
6M
6.58%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-1.32%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
8.31%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUS vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEUS and GXLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUS vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUS
FEUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUS vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEUSGXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

FEUS vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEUS vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUS drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUS and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUSGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-9.08%

-16.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-3.05%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-1.54%

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

Volatility

FEUS vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUSGXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

13.85%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

13.85%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

13.85%

+3.18%

FEUS vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEUS vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

FEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FEUS
FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund
1.01%1.06%1.15%1.41%1.48%0.36%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.65%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FEUS and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FEUS.

FEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

FEUS tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FEUS and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUS and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer