FETH vs. SIVR
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -38.43% vs 85.68% for SIVR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
FETH vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -44.01% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's -4.75% return.
FETH
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -26.28%
- YTD
- -44.01%
- 6M
- -46.08%
- 1Y
- -38.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -22.74%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 85.68%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
FETH vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -44.01% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and SIVR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
SIVR
FETH vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FETH | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.29 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.90 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 4.12 | -5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FETH vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.57% | -75.85% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.57% | -45.33% | -22.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.74% | -41.89% | -23.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.30% | -47.83% | +14.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.31% | 20.85% | +18.46% |
Volatility
FETH vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) have volatilities of 17.03% and 16.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.03% | 16.37% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.32% | 59.11% | -12.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.12% | 59.76% | +9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.38% | 36.48% | +35.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.38% | 32.03% | +40.35% |
FETH vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FETH vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FETH nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FETH and SIVR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to SIVR (16.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.57% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 85.68% vs -38.43% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 16.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 85.68% return vs -38.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
FETH and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SIVR is Silver. FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FETH and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer